Unequal Fight for Billion-Zloty Contracts
Polish construction procurement sidelines domestic firms through strict tender rules. Learn why this matters for expats working or investing in Poland.
Polish construction procurement is skewed against domestic firms, pushing them out of major contracts. Consequently, strict tender rules often reduce local companies to subcontractors.
Why Polish construction procurement favors foreign groups
The market shows clear capital imbalance. Moreover, foreign-controlled firms win over 70 percent of big infrastructure contracts. However, Polish companies often match technical skills and experience. In addition, tender rules focus on financial thresholds and past references. Therefore, they reward firms with global turnover and foreign market records. For example, the Central Communication Port tender demanded 4 billion zł in annual revenues. Consequently, Poland’s largest domestic builder with about 3 billion zł revenue could not bid.
How rules, courts and finance stack the deck
Procurement conditions also require rare project references. For instance, some tenders request three hospitals worth over 500 million zł each. However, Poland builds few such hospitals. Therefore, foreign groups easily supply those references. Moreover, global giants access long-term bank guarantees more easily. In addition, small and medium Polish firms lack such financial firepower. Consequently, many domestic firms remain subcontractors despite having local teams and expertise.
The Rail Baltica dispute and wider consequences
Mirbud challenged exclusion from Rail Baltica on procedural grounds. Moreover, the company argues that a small fine of 15,000 zł unfairly blocked its offer. Therefore, a court hearing on 19 June 2026 could set a precedent. If Mirbud wins, the state could save about 650 million zł. However, the scale of appeals to the National Appeal Chamber (KIO) has surged. Consequently, appeals rose from 2,500 to 6,000 annually. In addition, companies sometimes use minor procedural faults to stall rivals. Therefore, strategic projects face paralysis and cost overruns.
Industry voices propose remedies. In addition, Mirbud and others ask for a 30 percent minimum share for firms with Polish ownership. Moreover, experts urge realistic revenue thresholds and flexible experience scoring. Therefore, the proposals aim to keep capital and expertise in Poland. Furthermore, leaders recommend a stable Railway Fund, similar to the road fund. In addition, they suggest expanding Public-Private Partnerships for local projects. Consequently, PPPs can mobilize Polish capital for regional infrastructure. However, municipalities need legal education to use PPPs safely.
For expats, these shifts matter. Moreover, procurement rules affect hiring, subcontracting, and local business opportunities. Therefore, job offers, salaries, and contract stability may change with policy moves. In addition, investments in CPK and Ukraine reconstruction can open roles for foreign engineers and managers. Finally, watch upcoming court rulings closely. They will shape who builds Poland’s future.
Source: Read original article
📚 Looking for more help settling in Poland? Browse our complete Expat Guides.

